TestingXperts

How to Overcome Web UI Automation Challenges?

Several enterprises across the globe have changed their business model online and this has made them completely be dependent on mobile applications and websites. The enterprises are constantly revolved around interacting with customers, order placement, and transactions. Since it is the main medium for them to enhance their business profit, it becomes crucial for them to test their applications user interface with web automated testing.

But, there are several scenarios where testing teams eliminate automation and prefer manual testing because of the challenges that arise when performing web UI testing. However, to overcome these challenges, find this as a simple guide.

What is Web UI Testing?

UI testing or the User Interface testing is one of the software testing processes that is used for identifying and eliminating the graphical user interface defects. And, the process of testing the UI of various web-based applications with the help of automation tools is known as Web UI automation testing.

Web UI Testing means testing the usability and functionality features of the web application and websites. Today’s end-users require high performing applications that enable seamless experience, and to make this ensured, there is a crucial need for the enterprises to perform effective web UI automation testing.

What are the challenges to overcome with Web UI Testing?

Web UI Testing is essential but to make this testing process most effective, enterprises have to overcome certain challenges.

Constantly Changing UI: Web application’s UI is the most prone aspect for changes. These changes are made mainly to meet the business logic or to add new features, or due to changes made in the requirements during the development stage. Due to this constant update, it becomes troublesome for the teams to maintain the test scripts.

Handling errors: In web UI automation testing, error handling is one of the most difficult processes. This becomes even more critical when it is performed on complex projects.

To test the UI Elements: Testing UI elements are often considered to be one of the difficult challenge faced by UI automation testers.

Execution of Test Scripts: In web UI testing, it is common to have more number of test cases. This directly leads to experiencing more time for execution.

These are a few of the challenges that are considered critical; however, there are even more. Therefore, the best way to ensure the web UI automation testing is not affected is by opting for UI testing services. Leverage Web UI testing services from leading QA testing services provider for delivering user-friendly web apps and websites for end-users.

How many agile methods are there?

The Agile method illustrated underneath shares a significant part of the equivalent overall way of thinking, just as a considerable lot of similar attributes and practices. From an execution outlook, be that as it may, each has its own extraordinary blend of practices, phrasing, and strategies.

The most widely-used Agile methodologies include:

Agile Scrum Methodology

Lean Software Development

Kanban

Extreme Programming (XP)

Crystal

Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM)

Feature Driven Development (FDD)

Agile Scrum Methodology

Scrum is a lightweight Agile undertaking the executives system that can be utilized to oversee iterative and gradual ventures, all things considered. It has picked up expanding fame throughout the years because of its effortlessness, demonstrated profitability, and capacity to join different overall practices advanced by other Agile models.

In Scrum, the Product Owner works intimately with their group to recognize and organize framework usefulness by making a Product Backlog. The Product Backlog comprises of whatever should be never really convey a working programming framework, including highlights, bug fixes, non-practical prerequisites, and so on Whenever needs have been set up, cross-utilitarian groups will gauge and join to convey “possibly shippable additions” of programming during progressive Sprints, commonly enduring 30 days. When a Sprint’s Product Backlog is submitted, no extra usefulness can be added to the Sprint besides by the group. When a Sprint has been conveyed, the Product Backlog is dissected and reprioritized, if essential, and the following arrangement of expectations is chosen for the following Sprint.

Associations are in any event, hoping to apply Agile Scrum standards to their RPA (Robotic Process Automation) activities to execute robotization at scale. Receiving Agile Scrum standards gives RPA groups or RPA Centers of Excellence the adaptability to plan and streamline business cycles to be computerized forthright, keep an effective excess of work that advances development, and execute consistent figuring out how proportional start to finish computerization.

What are types of regression testing?

Today, every customer wants updated software, and in order to provide this, every organization is releasing constant updates in features and functionalities. But these frequent updates and changes sometimes affect the existing functionality of the software. This is where regression testing comes into the picture as it ensures the stability of software even after frequent changes.

What is regression testing?
Regression testing is an important software testing type which involves re-running the functional and non-functional test. These tests are conducted to ensure that the previously developed and checked software works fine as expected even after the change is made to the software.

What are the types of regression testing?
Below mentioned are some of the major types of regression testing:
1. Unit regression testing: This type of regression test is usually conducted in isolation as it is focused on unit code. While performing this type of test all the interactions and dependencies are blocked.
2. Partial regression testing: Whenever a new code is added to the existing code, partial regression testing is conducted. It is done to check the interaction of new code with existing code to ensure that these codes can work together in a system as expected or not.
3. Complete regression testing: Whenever multiple changes are introduced to the system, complete regression testing is performed. It is done because minor and major changes both can affect the functionality of the software.
4. Progressive regression testing: Whenever changes are made in program specifications or new test cases are designed, a progressive regression test is performed.
5. Selective regression testing: This type of regression testing is done to check the impact of new code on already existing code. A subset from the already existing test case is used to conduct a selective regression test.
6. Retest-all regression testing: This type of testing is performed to test all aspects of the software even if the change is made or not. This involves reusing all test cases and re-testing every code of the software.
7. Corrective regression testing: When there is no change made in the software, a corrective regression test is performed. In this type of regression test already existing test case can be reused easily to perform the test.
Usually, every software goes through frequent changes and updates but during this process, there are chances of bugs getting introduced or existing functionality getting affected. Therefore, regression testing is done to ensure that the exiting functionality of software works as expected after software changes.
Leverage regression testing from a next-gen software testing services provider to get quality software that delivers a seamless customer experience.

What is required for integration testing?

INTEGRATION TESTING is a level of software testing where individual units / components are combined and tested as a group. The purpose of this level of testing is to expose faults in the interaction between integrated units. Test drivers and test stubs are used to assist in Integration Testing.

ISTQB Definition

integration testing: Testing performed to expose defects in the interfaces and in the

interactions between integrated components or systems. See also component integration testing, system integration testing.

component integration testing: Testing performed to expose defects in the interfaces and interaction between integrated components.

system integration testing: Testing the integration of systems and packages; testing interfaces to external organizations (e.g. Electronic Data Interchange, Internet).

Types

There are mainly two types of integration testing:

Unit / Component Integration Testing

This type of integration testing focuses on the interactions and interfaces between integrated units / components. Unit integration testing is performed after unit testing, and is generally automated. In iterative and incremental development, unit integration tests are usually part of the continuous integration process.

System Integration Testing

This type of integration testing focuses on the interactions and interfaces between systems (A system is a group of interacting or interrelated entities that form a unified whole). The other system that needs to be integrated with can either be internal or external (developed by someone else over which the organization has no control). Such systems are normally exposed via an Application Programming Interface (API) or a Microservice.

System Integration testing may be done after System Testing or in parallel with it.

Approaches

There are basically four approaches to Integration Testing:

Big Bang

This is an approach to Integration Testing where all or most of the units are combined together and tested at one go. This approach is taken when the testing team receives the entire software in a bundle. So what is the difference between Big Bang Integration Testing and System Testing? Well, the former tests only the interactions between the units while the latter tests the functionalities in the entire system.

Top Down

This is an approach to Integration Testing where top-level units are tested first and lower level units are tested step by step after that. This approach is taken when a top-down development approach is followed. Test Stubs are needed to simulate lower level units which may not be available during the initial phases.

Bottom Up

This is an approach to Integration Testing where bottom level units are tested first and upper-level units step by step after that. This approach is taken when a bottom-up development approach is followed. Test Drivers are needed to simulate higher level units which may not be available during the initial phases.

Sandwich/ Hybrid

This is an approach to Integration Testing which is a combination of Top Down and Bottom Up approaches.

Tips for Selenium Testing

Ensure that you have a proper Architecture / Technical Design document where interactions between each unit are clearly defined. In fact, you will not be able to perform Integration Testing without this information.

Ensure that you have a robust Software Configuration Management system in place. Or else, you will have a tough time tracking the right version of each unit, especially if the number of units to be integrated is many.

Make sure that each unit is unit tested before you start Integration Testing.

As far as possible, automate your tests, especially when you use the Top Down or Bottom-Up approach, because regression testing is important each time you integrate a unit and manual regression testing can be tedious/inefficient.

What is a good unit test?

Unit testing is a product development measure in which the littlest testable pieces of an application, called units, are exclusively and autonomously investigated for legitimate activity.

Unit tests are significant in light of the fact that they give you certainty. At the point when you have a set-up of good unit tests, you can refactor your code without breaking things. You can add highlights without making new bugs.

In any case, composing great unit tests isn’t simple. I’ve seen a great deal of groups burn through a colossal measure of time and energy composing unit tests that truly don’t help them much.

So what do ‘great’ unit tests resemble?

Great unit tests are free and separated

They test each thing in turn, preferably with one affirmation. They don’t cause results. They unquestionably don’t depend on results. You can run them in any request they actually pass. They don’t rely upon anything aside from the unit of code under test. They don’t get to the worldwide express, the record framework, or an information base.

Great unit tests are engaging

At the point when a test bombs you should have the option to see its name and promptly understand what a piece of the code is broken. There are endless shows you can use to name your tests. Here are a couple of I’ve seen around

MethodName_StateUnderTest_ExpectedBehavior

MethodName_ExpectedBehavior_StateUnderTest

Should_ExpectedBehavior_When_StateUnderTest

When_StateUnderTest_Expect_ExpectedBehavior

However long the name can mention to you what it’s trying, the rest is simply an issue of taste. So pick one and stick to it.

Unit testing is a product improvement measure in which the littlest testable pieces of an application, called units, are separately and autonomously examined for appropriate activity.

Be that as it may, composing great unit tests isn’t simple. I’ve seen a ton of groups burn through an immense measure of time and energy composing unit tests that truly don’t help them much.

So what do ‘great’ unit tests resemble?

Great unit tests are free and disengaged

They test each thing in turn, preferably with one declaration. They don’t cause results. They unquestionably don’t depend on results. You can run them in any request they actually pass. They don’t rely upon anything aside from the unit of code under test. They don’t get to the worldwide express, the document framework, or an information base.

Great unit tests are clear

At the point when a test bombs you should have the option to see its name and promptly understand what a piece of the code is broken. There are innumerable shows you can use to name your tests. Here are a couple of I’ve seen around

MethodName_StateUnderTest_ExpectedBehavior

MethodName_ExpectedBehavior_StateUnderTest

Should_ExpectedBehavior_When_StateUnderTest

When_StateUnderTest_Expect_ExpectedBehavior

However long the name can mention to you what it’s trying, the rest is simply an issue of taste. So pick one and stick to it.

Types of Software Testing – The Ultimate List

In this post ‘types of Software Testing’, I might want to make reference to practically all the product testing types in a single spot. One test to finding out about programming testing is that there are numerous terms in the business, and these terms frequently utilized conflictingly. While there are no generally acknowledged definitions for all the testing terms, I think a good source is to refer to ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level Syllabus.

Software Testing: It is a cycle, to assess the usefulness of a product application with a goal to discover if the created programming met the predetermined prerequisites and to recognize the deformities to guarantee that the item is sans imperfection to deliver a quality item. Peruse more on Software Testing Definitions and Approaches.

The Ultimate List of Types of Testing:

We should see various types of software testing individually.

1. Functional testing: In basic words, what the framework really does is useful trying. To check that each capacity of the product application acts as indicated in the necessity report. Testing all the functionalities by giving proper contribution to check whether the real yield is coordinating the normal yield or not. It falls inside the extent of discovery testing and the analyzers need not worry about the source code of the application.

2. Non-functional testing: In straightforward words, how well the framework performs is non-usefulness testing. Non-useful testing alludes to different parts of the product, for example, execution, load, stress, versatility, security, similarity, and so on, Main center is to improve the client experience on how quick the framework reacts to a solicitation.

3. Manual testing: Manual testing is the way toward testing the product physically to discover the deformities. An analyzer should have the point of view of an end-client and to guarantee all the highlights are functioning as referenced in the prerequisite record. In this cycle, analyzers execute the experiments and create the reports physically without utilizing any mechanization apparatuses.

4. Automated testing: Automation testing is the way toward testing the product utilizing a robotization apparatus to discover the deformities. In this cycle, executing the test contents and producing the outcomes are performed naturally via mechanization devices. Some most well known apparatuses to do robotization testing are HP QTP/UFT, Selenium WebDriver, and so forth,

5. Black box testing: Black Box Testing is a product testing strategy in which analyzers assess the usefulness of the product under test without taking a gander at the inner code structure. This can be applied to each degree of programming testing, for example, Unit, Integration, System, and Acceptance Testing.

6. Unit testing: Unit Testing is additionally called Module Testing or Component Testing. It is done to check whether the individual unit or module of the source code is working appropriately. It is finished by the designers in the engineer’s current circumstance.

Why digital transformation is so important?

Digital transformation denotes an extremist reexamining of how an association utilizes innovation, individuals and cycles to generally change business execution. Digital transformation requires cross-departmental coordinated effort in matching business-centered methods of reasoning with fast application improvement models.

Such far reaching developments are ordinarily attempted in quest for new plans of action and new income streams, driven by changes in client desires around items and administrations. “Client desires are far surpassing what you can truly do. “That implies an essential reevaluation about what we do with innovation in associations.”

Digital Transformation Tips

Making responsibility — who is answerable for what — clear is fundamentally significant forthright, however organizations can follow a few different strides to influence the sort of progress they want.

Savagely center around and away from destinations. Regardless of whether you’re changing a current model or beginning without any preparation, pioneers must arrive at an agreement on the best way to seek after.

Be striking when setting the degree. Fruitful digital changes are 1.5 occasions more probable than others to be enterprise wide in scale. This will likewise assist CIOs with perceiving the greatest blast from their tech ventures.

Grasp versatile plan. The times of forthright speculation prerequisites and inflexible KPIs are finished. Versatile plan empowers CIOs to seek after month to month or even week by week changes to the change procedure, including reallocating ability.

“We see this flexibility instilled in the plan of effective changes, including that business heads announcing achievement were multiple occasions bound to encourage month to month acclimations to procedure.

Receive agile execution. Support hazard taking, empowering even lower-level representatives to decide, flop quick and learn. It’s alright to upset yourself. Fruitful computerized change requires preemptive changes as opposed to responding to serious weights or disruptors.

What are the objectives of integration testing?

Integration Testing is a degree of programming testing where singular units are consolidated and tried as a gathering. The motivation behind this degree of testing is to uncover blames in the association between coordinated units. Test pilots and test stubs are utilized in System Integration Testing.

Definition by ISTQB

Integration testing: Testing performed to uncover surrenders in the interfaces and in the

cooperation between incorporated parts or frameworks.

Component integration testing: Testing performed to uncover surrenders in the interfaces and

association between coordinated parts.

System integration testing: Testing the reconciliation of frameworks and bundles; testing

interfaces to outer associations.

Objectives of integration testing

Big Bang is a way to deal with Integration Testing where all or the greater part of the units are consolidated together and tried at one go. This methodology is taken when the testing group gets the whole programming in a pack. So what is the contrast between Big Bang Integration Testing and System Testing? Indeed, the previous tests just the connections between the units while the last tests the whole framework.

Top-Down is a way to deal with Integration Testing where top-level units are tried first and lower-level units are tried bit by bit after that. This methodology is adopted when top-down improvement strategy is pursued. Test Stubs are expected to mimic lower-level units which may not be accessible during the underlying stages.

Bottom-Up is a way to deal with Integration Testing where base level units are tried first and upper-level units bit by bit after that. This methodology is adopted when the base up improvement strategy is pursued. Test pilots are expected to reproduce more significant level units which may not be accessible during the underlying stages.

Sandwich/Hybrid is a way to deal with Integration Testing which is a blend of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches.

Tips

Guarantee that you have a legitimate Detail Design record where cooperations between every unit are plainly characterized. Truth be told, you won’t have the option to perform Integration Testing without this data.

Ensure that you have a strong Software Configuration Management framework set up. Or the consequences will be severe, you will make some intense memories following the correct rendition of every unit, particularly if the quantity of units to be incorporated is gigantic.

Ensure that every unit will be unit tried before you start Integration Testing.

Beyond what many would consider possible, automate your tests, particularly when you utilize the Top-Down or Bottom-Up approach, since regression testing is significant each time you incorporate a unit, and manual regression testing can be wasteful.

How‌ ‌to‌ ‌avoid‌ ‌common‌ ‌mistakes‌ ‌with‌ ‌automation‌ ‌in‌ ‌testing?‌ ‌

Accomplishment in test automation is less about taking care of business and progressively about staying away from botches that let expensive deformities traverse—and even little bugs can have enormous outcomes. In view of that, here are a couple of the repetitive (“dangerous”) botches that you need to manage automation in testing.

1. Drive testing completely through the UI

In the event that you do a Google look for “test robotization,” the initial dozen models are probably going to be tied in with driving the whole framework through the UI. That implies opening up a program or portable test system and interfacing with a back end over the Internet. In any case, that is moderate.

2. Overlook the assemble/test/send pipeline

As of late, a client acquired my association to do an examination and make a suggestion on test tooling. At the point when we got some information about the group’s fabricate procedure and how they sent new forms, they were amazed. That wasn’t on the menu, they said; the task was to mechanize the testing procedure.

3. Set up test information through the UI

During an ongoing counseling task, an analyzer revealed to me he invested 90 percent of his energy setting up test conditions. The application permitted universities and other enormous associations to arrange their work process for installment handling. One school may set up self-administration booths, while another might have a money window where the teller could just approve up to a specific dollar sum. Still others may require a supervisor to drop or favor an exchange over a specific dollar sum. A few schools assumed certain acknowledgment cards, while others acknowledged money as it were. To recreate any of these conditions, the analyzer needed to sign in, make a work process physically, and build up a lot of clients with the correct authorizations before at last doing the testing. At the point when we discussed robotization draws near, our underlying discussion was about apparatuses to drive the UI.

4. Keep tests independent and particular from development

Another issue with test tooling, one that is increasingly unpretentious, particularly in UI testing, is that it doesn’t occur until the whole framework is sent. To make a mechanized test, somebody must code, or possibly record, all the activities. En route, things won’t work, and there will be introductory bugs that get revealed back to the developers. In the long run, you get a spotless trial, days after the story is first coded. In any case, when the trials, it just has an incentive in case of some regression, where something that worked yesterday doesn’t work today.

Regression Testing Principles and Practices

Regression testing includes testing the unaltered pieces of an application over and over. It guarantees that the past use of an application is filling in as planned and the new element that has been added doesn’t present any new bug or blunder. This is fundamentally a cycle of confirmation.
Regression testing is begun when the developer adds another usefulness to an application or fixes any bug. This is a result of the reliance between the recently added and past usefulness. This testing/confirmation holds huge significance, particularly when there are persistent changes or improvements in the application.
Regression Testing Strategy
The measure of regression testing required relies on the recently added highlight. On the off chance that the element is huge, at that point there are more odds of the application getting influenced. In this way, testing must be performed altogether considering all the experiments.
Contingent on the data sources accumulated by the analyzer, regression testing can be computerized utilizing selenium with the goal that the experiments can be effectively executed in another form. At the point when the test degree is huge then particular tests are executed to spare expense and time. Regression testing is essentially performed to:
Re-execute the recently performed tests
Contrast the current outcomes and the past outcomes
These are performed at different stages consistently all through the product testing lifecycle. The most ideal path is to perform regression testing after mental stability or smoke testing. A compelling test plan must be made to diagram the regression testing technique and leave standards. Execution testing should likewise be possible to guarantee ideal framework execution.
Regression Testing Best Practices
Define an arrangement consistently for regression testing
Perform wanted activity and check anticipated reaction for rightness
Regression test must not be obsolete and must be right
Dissect deformity getting away from identification during the cycle
Ought to make a consistent group of experiments as opposed to having one huge regression test
Test suites must be planned based on the 80/20 standard of the executives
Perform regression testing after each effective incorporate for more modest activities
Plan regression testing dependent on the danger factors over the business
Distinguish application zone with a high danger of disappointment
Connection regression testing with utilitarian testing
Re-run fruitful useful experiments
Regression testing must be considered as a vital piece of outrageous programming technique